TypScript – Entwickler
Suchen Sie nach TypeScript-Experten? Entdecken Sie unser Katalog von Top-IT-Unternehmen und Freelancern, die sich auf TypeScript-Entwicklung spezialisiert haben. Finden Sie noch heute den richtigen Anbieter für Ihr Projekt.
ITFB ist ein russisches IT-Unternehmen. Wir entwickeln und implementieren Software.
- Min. Projekt
- $3k+
Seit 2023 · 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Durchführung umfassender AnalysenErfassen funktionaler und nicht-funktionaler AnforderungenEntwickeln...
- Min. Projekt
- $10k+
- Stundensatz
- $30–$80/Std.
Cascais · Seit 2016 · 11-50 Mitarbeiter
We Build Products That Don’t Just Work — They Perform From MVPs to full-scale platforms — we craft software driven by real business metrics
- Min. Projekt
- $5k+
- Stundensatz
- $40–$65/Std.
Wir von ITSpecial machen coole Software und Webseiten für Kunden. Unsere Kunden sind russische und ausländische Unternehmen.....
- Min. Projekt
- $10k+
Seit 2025 · 1-10 Mitarbeiter
Wir sind ein junges Team mit kochendem Blut, das bereit ist, die besten Projekte zu machen und das Maximum herauszuholen....
- Min. Projekt
- $100+
Unser Unternehmen ist auf professionelle Web-Entwicklung spezialisiert und hat sich im Laufe der Jahre selbst entwickelt ...
- Min. Projekt
- $3k+
- Min. Projekt
- $10k+
Wir sind spezialisiert auf Webprodukte, einschließlich Website-Entwicklung, Online-Aufgabenautomatisierung...
- Min. Projekt
- $3k+
Before you shortlist anyone
All calculatorsThe short answer
340 TypScript companies are listed. 69% publish a minimum project budget; the median floor is $10k. Most work starts in the $10–20k range. Median published rate is $25/hr across 18 companies.
Best supplied: USA (55) · Indien (38) · Polen (18)
Recalculated 2026-10-21 from live profiles.
What it costs, by country
Each cell counts companies whose published minimum project budget falls in that band. Only countries with at least 5 listed companies appear.
| Country | under $3k | $3–10k | $10–20k | $20–30k | $30k+ | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deutschland1 | — | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| USA55Widest choice | 1 | 9 | 12 | 8 | 15 | — |
| Indien38 | — | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — |
| Polen18 | — | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | — |
| Ukraine16 | — | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | — |
| Vereinigtes Königreich8 | — | 1 | 3 | 2 | — | — |
| Rumänien5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | — | — |
How this table is built
- Figures are minimum project budgets companies publish on their own profiles — the floor below which they decline work, not the price of a finished project.
- USD only. Companies quote in six currencies and averaging across them produces a number nobody charges.
- Budgets outside $300–$2,000,000 and rates outside $5–$500/hr are dropped as data-entry errors.
- A country needs 5 listed companies for a row, and 5 published rates before a median rate is shown.
What will your budget reach?
Move the slider. Every figure below is a count of companies whose published minimum project budget sits at or under that amount.
68 of 233 companies (29%) take projects at this size.
Where the entry thresholds sit
- under $3k
- 7
- $3–10k
- 61
- $10–20k
- 63
- $20–30k
- 50
- $30k+
- 52
Goes furthest in USA — 10 companies
This says who will engage, not what your scope should cost. A budget that reaches most of the market still buys very different things depending on what you are building.
Who is focused, and who has proved it
Horizontal: how concentrated a company is on TypScript. Vertical: how much checkable evidence stands behind it. 59 of 340 companies are plotted — the rest have fewer than 2 evidence signals, so placing them would be guesswork.
- SoftMediaLabLeaders
- CSSChopperLeaders
- DashBouquet DevelopmentLeaders
- ElinextLeaders
- AnadeaLeaders
- RubyGarageLeaders
How a company is placed
- Focus is the inverse of how many categories a company claims, blended with the share of its portfolio tagged with this one. A firm listing three technologies is concentrated; a firm listing forty also appears here.
- Proven delivery adds published reviews (to 20), portfolio projects (to 25), Ahrefs Domain Rating (to 60) and years listed (to 10). Each is capped so no single signal carries a company to the top.
- Positions are relative to the other companies on this page: the median company sits at the centre of each axis, so a quadrant boundary means "ahead of half the companies listed here". Raw scores are in each bubble's tooltip.
- Deliberately excluded: the star rating, which sits in too narrow a band to separate anyone; the editorial rank, which is a hand-assigned sort weight; and paid verification, which does not move anything on this chart.
- Leaders:
- Concentrated on this work and with the record to show for it.
- Specialists:
- This is most of what they do, but the public evidence is still thin.
- Established generalists:
- A substantial track record, spread across many categories.
- Emerging:
- Building both focus and evidence.
Kundenbewertungen über TypScript
eTecc / Interactive
Horrible service. Refr ain from using this company
Aksamit Projects
Alvera Solutions OÜ cooperated with Aksamit Projects on a number of development and delivery-related tasks. Throughout the collaboration, the Aksamit Projects team demonstrated a structured approach to work, strong technical competence, and a clear understanding of the project requirements. The scope of work included task planning, implementation, and ongoing coordination. All assigned tasks were completed in accordance with the agreed specifications, timelines, and quality standards. Communication was professional and consistent, which ensured smooth progress and timely decision-making during all project phases. Aksamit Projects proved to be a reliable and responsible partner, capable of efficiently handling assigned tasks and adapting to evolving project needs. We can confidently recommend Aksamit Projects for professional collaboration on technical and project-based engagements.
ENCYPHERS
ENCYPHERS has been a reliable long-term partner for Axo across e-commerce optimization, UX refinement, and platform performance improvements. Their team helped strengthen the customer journey through better page structure, smoother navigation, and conversion-focused enhancements while also improving technical stability and overall site responsiveness. The collaboration has remained professional and consistent throughout, with practical improvements that continue to support our ecommerce growth and user experience.
Portfolio-Projekte
Verwandte Kategorien
Warum Wadline vertrauen
Wadline ist eine vertrauenswürdige Plattform zur Suche nach IT-Unternehmen und Agenturen. Wir helfen Unternehmen, fundierte Entscheidungen durch verifizierte Bewertungen und transparente Informationen zu treffen.
Verifizierte Kundenbewertungen
Jede Bewertung auf Wadline wird überprüft. Wir bestätigen die Authentizität des Kundenfeedbacks durch Überprüfung von Projektdetails, Zeitplänen und Ergebnissen.
Datengesteuerte Rankings
Unsere Unternehmensrankings basieren auf Daten. Jedes Unternehmen wird nach Expertise, Erfahrung, Portfolioqualität und Kundenzufriedenheit bewertet.
Globale Reichweite
Wadline verbindet Unternehmen weltweit mit zuverlässigen Technologiepartnern. Unsere Plattform bietet Unternehmen aus vielen Ländern.
Volle Transparenz
Von verifizierten Bewertungen und Portfolio-Highlights bis hin zu Servicefokus und Preisgestaltung bietet Wadline einen umfassenden Überblick über jedes Unternehmen.
Wir bewerten Dienstleister nach einer strukturierten Methodik, die Kundeninterviews, Portfolioanalyse und Marktpräsenzbewertung kombiniert.
Erfahren Sie mehr über unsere Methodik →Mit KI erkunden
Erhalten Sie eine KI-gestützte Zusammenfassung der Top-Unternehmen in dieser Kategorie. Klicken Sie auf einen Dienst, um diese Seite zu analysieren.